health information
Hardball – Bush Vetoes Children’s Health Insurance Bill
children’s health insurance
More at www.MaddowFans.com Oct. 3, 2007 Is President Bush right for vetoing a children’s health insurance bill? The bill would increase health coverage for poor children to families making up to three times the poverty level. Rachel Maddow and Pat Buchanan join Chris Matthews to discuss.
This entry was posted by admin on October 19, 2010 at 12:46 am, and is filed under Health Care Services. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
-
-
#6 written by lio77744 1 year ago
-
#10 written by wgaleano 1 year ago
pat is a f%$%^& dick, its poeple like him that only care for themsleves, if he ever reads this… WHY is USA 37th in Health care system, and why do more than 18,000 poeple die a year because they dont have health insurance? Pat Put yourslef in the shoes of a father that can’t afford health insurance and then say “how will pay for the 8 million KIDS that don’t have health insurance?”
-
#14 written by 1993CorradoSLC 1 year ago
No, we actually understand economics you twat. What I don’t understand is retards like yourself constantly championing social programs but you are unwilling to pay for it. You want higher taxes, send the federal government a check. In the mean time, shut your trap and let hard working Americans who make LESS than 60-80k a year feed their families.
-
#15 written by 1993CorradoSLC 1 year ago
-
#21 written by Vanlander777 1 year ago
If someone is making $80000 a year, they SHOULD be able to get insurance for their kids, but what if they don’t? Just let them die?
And people are using the whole $80000 thing as an excuse to say it’s bad idea anyway. The point is, it would also benefit the poorest people.
Without thinking of politics or economics or anything, which is right? Free health care for kids, or letting children, both rich and poor, die? The government always manages to pay for what it wants to pay for. -
#23 written by TimLoganKnows911623 1 year ago
One payer system is the only way to go.
Private health insurance is a private tyranny that only exists in United States. It’s a rather barbaric system that tells you you’re health is only worth what you can afford.
People in United States should get behind, and support, HR 676. If you don’t know what it is learn about it! GM & Ford are going bankrupt because of the rising cost of health care. If United States had single-payer system, the companies wouldn’t have to worry about it.
-
#24 written by bfaith456 1 year ago
Rachel, you go–what a gal! why does Pat B. yell every time he talks and Rachel keeps her cool=she is right and he knows it but doesn’t want to admit it! plus now it is 12/2008 and look at the billions of dollars spent on the so call “bail-outs”/executive bounus, which could have been spent to insure the children–Pat said no $ to insure the children but $ was available for the executive bounus/bail out funds….
- Cord blood banking institutions could be the investment in our lengthy-expression health
- Is there a dental insurance / plans that pay for everything?
- Family Dental Insurance – Choosing the Correct Strategy
- Minimal Invasive Method For Varicose Veins Treatment only in Aastha Well being Treatment Hospital
- Im looking to get my family dental insurance, but i dont know where to start!?
- Any dental discount plans or insurance that covers orthodontics for adults?
- Any recommendations for affordable individual/family dental insurance?
- need help with finding a dentist in Austin, TX who excepts medicaid insurance?
- What do you pay for family dental insurance?
- What is your opinion on “eating disorders” units in “state” mental hospital for those with no insurance?
EVERY other industrialized country gives health care to EVERY one of it’s citizens. it’s no more of a socialist thing than the american fire depts, but of course republicans crave to privatize human rights.