health information
Brain Mind and Behavior: Why Drugs for Depression?
depression drugs
Take a look into our current understanding of the function of the human brain and some of the important diseases that cause nervous system dysfunction. On this edition, Dr. Steve Hamilton of the UCSF department of psychiatry explores some of the current understanding of depression and its treatment. Series: “UCSF Mini Medical School for the Public” [10/2007] [Health and Medicine] [Show ID: 13012]
-
-
#4 written by hsttraindriver 1 year ago
Read Explaining colours to a blind man. Not only will it enlighten many as to what living with a mental illness is like, it also gives comfort to those sufferers who think there is no hope and that they are alone. It is very informative, sometimes shocking but also very funny in parts. All in all, a good read and highly recommended.
-
#6 written by waltermouthoh 1 year ago
Want to get rid of depression? Do you really? Do you have an open mind? OK, here’s what you do. Get Orange Carnelian Stones and hold them in either hand for an hour. You’ll be amazed!
You don’t believe me? Check out “Chemtrails dissolved” on youtube. Orgone tubes use crystals to bust chemtrails. Make some orgone and feel better! Use Carnelian. Carnelian dissolves negativity. Red Jasper – nurturing, gets rid of hang ups. Tiger Eye. Fluorite is calming. good site: soisnessdotorg. -
#8 written by waltermouthoh 1 year ago
Did you even see “chemtrails dissolved”? Do you want to even consider applying the scientific method? Like someone hundreds of years ago who absolutely contends that the Earth is flat, just because everyone else says so. “The mass awareness which is truly a lack of awareness..”
So “Glitch”, who do you work for? Nice name – “Glitch”! What’s the inside joke? You gotta be a little more subtle. I mean we can see right through it.
-
#9 written by Gliktch 1 year ago
Well I did do a search but since there is no result for “chemtrails dissolved”, I will assume you meant this video:
/watch?v=ce2i5NgAFaE
which provides no scientific reasoning or anything even approaching a valid research methodology – all it shows is a pretty cloud trail from a small aircraft catching the evening sunset before dissipating, at what I perceive as being a fairly average sort of speed… (cont.)
-
#10 written by Gliktch 1 year ago
Furthermore, those who proposed the ’round earth’ model had to provide evidence, reasoning and hypotheses, experiments and so forth. They then had to explain the findings as they corresponded with the other established sciences, and generally present a strong case for their argument before the paradigm was shifted in favour of their ideas, which it did because it held up against skeptical enquiry. I see no positive peer-reviewed studies on cloudbusting or even its theoretical basis in Orgonomy.
-
#12 written by waltermouthoh 1 year ago
True unbiased scientific research is very hard to come by these days when colleges and universities are funded by big oil and big pharma. Same goes with what you hear on the propaganda tube and other mass media, all of which are owned (sponsored) primarily by big oil and big (petrol based) pharma. Take for example, MMS. Have you heard about it in the media reports? What does it do? They don’t talk about it. link about MMS is at soisnessdotorg.
-
#13 written by Gliktch 1 year ago
“funded by big oil and big pharma”
Certainly no argument here – I agree that the consolidation of power in the hands of the few is very worrying; the ironic thing is that one needs to amass power for oneself before having any hope of either breaking out independently, or daring to oppose the establishment…
I don’t watch TV, haven’t for more than 2 years, most of it’s garbage (ESPECIALLY the news – it barely deserves the label any more), & the shows I do like are that much better without ads.
-
#14 written by Gliktch 1 year ago
My featured playlist in my channel is specifically for full-length lectures on new science etc, if you can point me to something reputable on YT I’d be happy to include it, but I’m not going to countenance the idea of a new type of matter or energy or something else equally ‘huge’ in impact terms unless it’s corroborated and not faith-based…
This is where I invoke the old saw about incredible claims requiring incredible standards of evidence.
-
#15 written by Gliktch 1 year ago
David, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that we still don’t have a comprehensive understanding of how the mind itself works, so knowing exactly how a drug or other substance affects it to bring about a (positive or negative) change… it just isn’t really possible, generally things get nutted out by a bit of hypothesis and a lot of trial and error, and you still get say 5% of people going nutso on a drug that calms other people down, these are the sorts of conflicting results they get..
-
#17 written by TIGDIF 1 year ago
facts = anti-depressents, antipsychotics (many/most) are made from fluoride hydroxide = do not “balance” brain chemicals there is no proof. Brain chemicals change all the time! Fluoride Hydroxide is the main ingredient of PROZAC. also, In WW2 the germans and russians use Fluoride in the water supply of prisoners of war to “DUMB THEM DOWN” so they were easier to handle = not give a $%£^t. Big Pharma sell these poisons to the medical profession = BIG £££. Stress is the main cause of all “dis-ease”
- Comment Feed for this Post
Good job. Very bright man