an important question about the movements of the Congress to reform the health system is how they plan to pay for it. A variety of budget cuts and tax increases proposed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, provide affordable health care. Many are particularly concerned about the impact of the decline of the proposal of the Senate Finance plan for Medicare. However, the AARP (American Association for Retired Persons) has recently announced that it is the Democratic bill, which supports approximately 0 billion Medicare cuts. Why should they back legislation that people over the age of 65, half of whom are card-holding member can harm them?

critics were to support her story a number of bills proposed by Democrats show and say that the group is comfortable with that party. AARP has a different opinion, Chief Executive A. Barry Rand told its members that the proposal would not reduce the guaranteed benefits related to health insurance financed by the government. He also stressed that the health insurance companies recently been plagued by inefficiency, waste and fraud – to eliminate these expenses should cover most of the deficit. Some believed that these unnecessary expenses unavoidable when the federal government is involved, which makes their support for a public option (is actually the form of “Medicare for all” health insurance) ridiculous.

Republicans like Senator John McCain warned that the cuts are some of the benefits of adjusting to many older people are expected goal came from Medicare Advantage. These benefits often include the participation in a gym in the form of physics hold, in addition to the vision of a better quality dental care. Medicare Advantage Plan A is the health insurance from private insurers to supplement the standard Medicare sold. Supporters of the bill for health care reform health admit that Medicare Advantage programs, the bulk of the reduction of federal funds face, but throw the providers of health plans, partially financed with subsidized premiums primarily on the profits of the company for its shareholders exorbitant salaries their executives.

It is certainly to reduce the potential costs. Studies show that an older person covered under a private health insurance (eg Medicare Advantage) Costs for the government 14% more on a regular Medicare. It remains to be seen whether the benefits outweigh that are older, supplements ongoing budget deficit. McCain has charged the use of that AARP Medicare funds as Bank “Piggy” for other health programs, which closer to bankruptcy. The organization also did not recognize the will of their own members have been criticized: There is no doubt that some overlap between their membership and participation in town hall rallies earlier this year.

The Senate should now vote on the cuts before Medicare debate on the reform of the comprehensive health care. Democratic Senator Michael Bennett will be spared a further amendment which would result in all Medicare benefits guaranteed suggested – a gesture cost, which he could recognize him his seat. His proposal would be more support from Democrats cautiously alienation of the most consistent demographic of voters. Meanwhile, McCain has proposed to see his own amendment to the language of provisions in connection with Medicare and back in the Senate committee. They are changing their health insurance, and understandably resistant are used.

Is AARP probably succeed in achieving its objective? The probability is high. There is strong 40 million members and has a powerful lobby group for decades. Even a fraction of them write letters or phone calls can have a significant impact on the pending legislation. The impact of such a measure will have on brands AARP offers health insurance remains to be seen.

(Image: ChiBart under CC 2.0)

Medicare Part D plans