health information
-
-
#4 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
-
#5 written by sebbbo77 2 years ago
If anyone does a half job its chiropractors. Giving a massage over a spine or tissue is like putting a flimsy bandage on a deep wound. Medically trained doctors go one step further – they do a FULL job by placing aluminum and titanium inserts into the spine and screwing them on to ENSURE CORRECT POSTURE. Chiropractors break bones, re-adjust spinal alignments and generally cause pain and suffering for clients. The reason the clients keep coming back is because the job is only HALF DONE.
-
#6 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
I don’t know if there is a single person in this world I could disagree with more, and there are almost 7 billion of us. Operations with implants and inserts yes. But a Doctor once asked, “if you had a peble in your shoe that cause you pain and someone suggested you take pain killers for it, what would you think of that individual?” Why not ask yourself that question?
-
#7 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
Another Doctor once said, “First I do no harm, but I can cause all the pain you need to get better.” A portion of that quote has been embraces by all Doctors, those believe upon by you and those not, as a life long doctrine. Disrespect the Creedo of those you defend? Now, now where are your manners? If you wish to debate medice please research your topic. Don’t bother me with childish games and half a job worth of study. Your opinion I value, your existence offends me. Thankyou.
-
#9 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
I’m sure everyone that disagrees with you must be uneducated. So your saying you’d agree with the side of the Doctor’s Parable where you’d take pain medicine to cure a peble in your shoe? You really didn’t respond to that at all and it was in my earlier post. Reading your post and not seeing any response to that made me feel like I was speaking to a lying, crooked, sexually disfunctional, career congressman… the kind that avoids topics he can’t answer. Please show me that I’m wrong. Please.
-
#10 written by sebbbo77 2 years ago
And what type of qualifications do you have you silly cunt. A “Alternative Certificate in Health and Wellbeing” will not QUALIFY you to make judgements on the health profession. Being a Masseur will equally not qualify you to vandalize spinal chords by masquerading behind the title of “chiropractor” when YOU YOURSELF only have a framed toilet roll scroll and 24 hours of a swedish scalp massage course.
-
#11 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
Still avoiding the topic I live by the creedo that, “we are what we eat”, so call me a cunt all you like. Your upset and unwilling to hold an adult conversation. I’ll leave you alone to your missery. I don’t practice Massage, except on my wife. Oh, and on my Retrievers ears (he likes that, lol). I don’t wreck spinal chords. My degrees are in Business Law and Accounting I have no clue as to you thinking I’m a doctor. You seem a little confused. My last post is unanswered as well
Oh well.
-
#12 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
-
#13 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
No, your right. I lied. I couldn’t help but comment again. Though it’s just, selfless, and doesn’t include any profanity.
The popping sounds you hear when people get any kind of chiropractic adjustment, or even when you crack your knuckles, is not bones breaking. I risk my promise to not comment against making this perfectly clear and educate you. The popping sound is nitrogen in your body, not bones breaking or tendens snapping. A medical doctor confirmed that. And now you know.
-
#14 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
…and the average on having a negative outcome to some sort of chiropractic visit is something in the high 1 to 50 millions. Meaning that only 1 in some 50 million visits produces something bad (other than complaining).
Of course I know someone who cries when he gets his back just rubbed. He’s big and bulky welder/mechanic type dude. I don’t think he’d have a positive outcome with a chiropractor in any case. Just saying.
-
#16 written by DraftMasterJohn 2 years ago
What was that? Did you say something ::pointing at myself:: You want a response to that? Very well. You say there are missed diagnosis, unreported date, inmeasurable outcomes, and results that “can be” Wow. That is more subjective than a Pablo Picaso. And trust me, he isn’t the only one with a big “P.P.” on his name tag. I don’t need to point do I? Its hard to argue with unreported facts. Tell me, do they also have flying zebras in this place you live? I would surely love to visit if they do.
-
#17 written by bla7091 2 years ago
The outcome “can be” dangerous, yes. “Can be” because it doesn’t always result in damage
Most if not all chiropractors would say such cases are nearly non-existant and that this method is completely safe
When there is a risk of getting a stroke while doing this, at least patients should be informed about it. That’s my 2 cents on this topic
-
#18 written by weversonman 2 years ago
this guy is such a con artist. I guarantee that any joe blow out there can go up to some patient and rub their back a little bit, poke around pretending like he’s doing some kind of test like this guy, and then lay them flat and crack their back by just pushing on it and the person will say their back feels better. Chiropractic is no different than a massage really. Except that it costs way more and makes claims way above what it can support.
-
#20 written by ospreylookout 2 years ago
chiro: Can you provide the physiological mechanism for “vitalism” and “subluxation”, which your profession claims is at the basis of your magical powers? Can you provide one shred of evidence that any study has ever supported these terms? Chiro is bs, and is practiced by under educated dr wannabies who failed the MCATS. But please, just offer the substantiated exxplanation. Reference citations would be most appreciated.
-
#21 written by ospreylookout 2 years ago
-
#22 written by ospreylookout 2 years ago
#2 Guardian, online: The statement, supported by just 29 citations, was ripped apart by bloggers within 24 hours of publication, before being subjected to a further shredding in the British Medical Journal. It emerged that 10 of the papers cited had nothing to do with chiropractic treatment, and several weren’t even studies. The remainder consisted of a small collection of poor-quality trials.
-
#23 written by ospreylookout 2 years ago
Guardian, online: Further criticism has been focused on the BCA’s presentation of supporting data, in particular its claim that a “plethora” of evidence backs the effectiveness of chiropractic in treating various childhood illnesses. Last year, facing demands that the BCA engage in scientific debate over its position, the association released its “plethora” to the public. Cont on #2.
-
#24 written by ospreylookout 2 years ago
Chiro: For the construct “subluxation” there’s no evidence that it exists or that “doing something about it” has an effect. The burden of proof falls on chiros show that the subluxation can be objectively demonstrated, that it does cause interference with the nervous system, and that it does cause disease. They have failed to do so for 115 years.
- Comment Feed for this Post
Firstly, Chiropractors are quacks.
Secondly – they’re better off as massuers
or prostitutes. How dare they call themselves
doctors?? Buah ha ha ha h aha ha